requestId:6851864e69d0b2.08366566.
“Use the body” and “Use the body”: Two steps to discuss Xiong Shili’s metaphysical learning
Author: Duan Chongyang
Source: The author authorized the Confucian network to publish, original article “Huadong Teachers’ Fair Major” (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 2023 Issue 1
Abstract: “Social” is the basis of Xiong Shili’s pursuit of all things in the universe. Although it has the distinction between “original conscience” and “physical”, this distinction should not be understood as the internal contradiction of its system, but presents the focus of metaphysical construction. The clarity of the broad (constant-original conscience) and the highest (one-yuan entity) and how the two share a “body” structure has become the focus of Xiong Shili metaphysical construction. The former points to “use the body” and the latter points to “use the body”, and the origin lies in using “use” or “action” to speak “each” and gaining the mastery of the two “body” through differences in “use”. “Use the body” and “Use the body” are two steps to learn from the perspective of the morphology. The former raises the questions of the highest and the broad, while the latter confesses how to grasp the relationship between the highest and the broad, and the two. Xiong Shili responded to these problems in a physical manner and understood a metaphysical path that was different from Buddhism and Western science.
Keywords: Xiong Shili; Physical theory; Metaphysical learning; Mind
Introduction
The “body use” structure is the most basic basis of Xiong Shili’s metaphysical structure, and there is a distinction between “body use” and “body use” in his philosophical thinking. The former appears in the linguistic text of “New Perspectives” (printed in 1953) and “Physical theory” (printed in 1958), while the latter appears in “Qian Kunyan” (printed in 1961). Guo Qiyong taught that this area reflects the contradiction between Xiong Shili Philosophical Construct, and its focus is the contradiction between “mind nature and nature” and “reality of reality”. “Xiong came to the age of two sides to open his bow, and on the one hand, he certainly emphasized the appearance of obstructing and smearing the Dharma, while on the other hand, he could not set the natural universe without any failure. The position of all things is to use the body and to verify each other, while integrating the body and making use of it”①. In other words, the emphasis on the inherently conscientious “body” in “use the body” will lead to the standpoint of denying the true reality of the matter, which happens to be criticized by “use the body”. This contradiction can be further engraved as the contradiction between the “body” in Xiong Shili’s philosophy, that is, the contradiction between “original conscience” and the “physical conscience” containing matter. As Zeng Hailong said: “(In “New Identity” – Introduction) The body is the original conscience of human beings, and ‘use of the body’ is the grand function of human beings, and it presents the entire world by the use of the original conscience of human beings.” “(In “Mingxin Chapter” – Introduction) If benevolence is not the body, there must be a different body, Xiong Shili points to the sky asThe reality of mind and matter is that there is a body outside the mind. …As the essence of a confidant is rejected, then the body can only be the universe’s reality.” ② In other words, this area is regarded as the difference between “only cognition” and “physical use”: “The main focus is on understanding, and the confession is that the mind and nature are the essence, and the physical discussion is very little. The main purpose of physical use is to express that the body is based on the body, and the universe is the condition of the mind and nature discussion”③, that is, the contradiction between “original conscience” and “physical”. However, the theoretical Zhangli presented by Xiong Shili in “using the body” and “physical use” has a more in-depth reason, rather than just a contradiction in theoretical construction. In terms of “only understanding” and “inclusive network use”, href=”https://twsweetmeet.com/”>Bao HaimeiThe former lies in “the behavior of thinking about the behavior of the tree and the ultimate basis of the behavior”④, while the latter is a method of pursuing the “final basis”. As Xiong Shili’s pursuit of the root of all things in the universe, he has “original conscience”inclusive and “physical”, but this difference should not be understood to be inconsistent with the internal contradiction of its system, but presents the problem of the focus of metaphysical construction, which makes it a metaphysical learning itself. At the same time, the need for “using the body” and “using the body” are regarded as bears. The differences between the metaphysical path of facing differences is the difference between the metaphysical path of expressing the metaphysical theory of its use and the Eastern philosophy, and it also shows two steps of ordinary metaphysical construction. Therefore, starting from this article, why did Xiong Shili discover the metaphysical learning of “physical use” by “only cognition”, and secondly, the “book that is clearly understood by “only cognition” is clearly understood by “only cognition”. Why does the conscience and “physical” form the focus of metaphysical construction of “physical use”, and Zhang Li, who tried to clarify these two “physical” is not a contradiction between Xiong Shili’s philosophy, but a request for ordinary metaphysical learning.
1 From “particular” to “use”: A pursuit of the roots
“From the meaning of consciousness The behavior of the tree-standing phenomenon reflects the tree-standing consciousness behavior” means that Xiong Shili receives the “mood arise” that Buddhism understands, and this “reflection” expresses the unity of consciousness and phenomena. In other words, Xiong Shili needs to explain the basis of which the mind and things can rise at the same time. This requires not only to understand the mind, but also to understand the source of the mind, that is, Baozhuang“This kind of (Tree – Introduce the case)The final basis for this is that “physical” and “physical” in Xiong Shili’s philosophy. This thinking can also be called “physical” by “knowing”.
In all, we will regard different tables, chairs and other objects as separate things, but Xiong Shili I believe that these things arise according to the mind. On the one hand, “appearances” such as whiteness exist according to the mind’s perception, and on the other hand, the things exist according to the mind’s concept. Therefore, “to understand things and self-realize themselves” and “to possess what they have learned” and have an assessment of the mind that can be realized. However, the mind that can be seen does not leave the things that they see, “the understanding does not arise alone, but depends on the environment. Feeling only depends on the trunk, and the mind depends on the shadow, and there must be some support in order to achieve success”⑤. After removing the true nature of the painting state of the lost mind, this structure can be fully based on the endless flow of “figure”. Therefore, the ultimate demand must be changed from this flow. Both the Kong Sect and You Sect of the Teachings have noticed the endless flow of “figure”, but in the eyes of Xiong Shili, it is not only 博官网The Hunting School established a true Dharma nature that is neither born nor resolute behind the Dharma image of reincarnation. However, some sects used the seeds and “each” of “each” by Ah Ye’s knowledge to avoid the mutual reason, and they failed to realize their ultimate mastery, because the former “only sees the silence of the nature, but the ignorance of the nature is also a breathless behavior”⑤, and the latter “establishes seeds as the source of biochemical, both together with the true nature and the double body, and and the current judgment of the two realms of ability and object”⑤, and failed to “see the body immediately”, so neither mastered the “physical body” and “physical body”. Although this criticism is internal to Buddhism, it also expresses the metaphysical characteristics of Xiong Shili who tried to stand through thinking through the use of body. This characteristic first shows the current recognition of “use”.
Although Xiong Shili criticized Buddhism, he was also influenced by the teachings in the depth of philosophy. It is the mastery of things developed by “action” – “From the past, Indian Buddhis
